Am I seriously the only person who’s looked at that photo and realized that there’s no “weiner” in it? Some idiot put a microphone in their underwear…. seriously, that’s no weiner. What do I base this on?
Well, here’s the photo:
and here’s a microphone:
Am I SERIOUSLY the only person out there who can tell the difference between a penis and a microphone? Seriously? Not that I’m some great expert in penises, but last time I checked (and it’s admittedly been a while), they didn’t get progressively larger as you got further from the body, and they didn’t have a perfect ridge around the end, and they weren’t perfectly rounded on top.
So not only is this whole “scandal” likely a fake (see http://cannonfire.blogspot.com/2011/05/was-congressman-weiner-smeared-yes.html), it’s not even a real “weiner”, much less Weiner’s weiner…. good grief people!
I’ll never look at a microphone the same way again ….. avert the eyes! avert, Averrrrrrrrrrrt!
While I realize that we’re all so accustomed to “sex” scandals these days that it’s easy to jump to conclusions — but NOBODY ELSE noticed this? NOBODY? Maybe I shouldn’t be stunned by that, but I am.